Does Roman Know Who He Wants?

The daily rumours and reports around who’ll be the next Chelsea manager are not only becoming farcial now but they’re slowly beginning to grate the nerves. While Roman seems to want a big name manager, focussing on the out-of-reach, Kenyon’s preference seems to be for someone a little more down to earth. But recent events have seen them both lose out on their preferred choices, with Milan issuing a firm hands-off their man and Hughes taking over at City amid rumours of both his impatience and Roman’s distain at ultimatums – depending which paper you read.

And the speculation will just continue at this ridiculous pace until Chelsea finally unveil their new man. But have they even identified who that is likely to be yet? So far, if you believe everything you read, Ancelotti, Hiddink and Klinsmann have all ruled themselves out, whilst Rijkaard and Mancini have both been on-and-off favourites at various times since Grant’s departure. And then there’s the odd name thrown in by the press here and there, presumably to fill column inches and keep us on our toes. Ultimately though, none of us really have a clue.

With Ten Cate’s sacking it had us all thinking an announcement was imminent and yet we’re all still as much in the dark as ever. One opinion is that the delay could run and run, dependent on what happens in Euro 2008. Although hanging around for Scolari who wouldn’t necessarily take the job anyway, could leave us facing even more nervous uncertainty than we are now.

I mean, we know we can definitely rule out Mourinho, with him now firmly in place at Inter and likewise Hughes at City, who’s now out of the running as well. Lippi and Eriksson, who always seemed unlikely candidates anyway, are looking increasingly unlikely to be in the frame and we’ve been warned off Ancelotti, so that’s him out as well. Of those left over, Laudrup’s rumoured to have met Roman in Moscow recently, Deschamps and Mancini allegedly quite fancy the job, although Mancini has remained fairly tight-lipped alongside Rijkaard. Not sure about Spalletti, although it’s a fair bet he didn’t even know he was being considered until Sky Sports announced it yesterday.

Rumour has it there was a meeting planned at Stamford Bridge yesterday to have a chat about how the search is progressing, although the club is also reported to have clearly stated just days ago that they are “extremely happy” with whatever it is they’ve done so far to replace Grant. The trouble is, none of us have any idea exactly what it is they have done and we’re nowhere near as happy as they are. Presumably, since some of us would still like to think that it’ll be the new manager who decides who’s bought and sold this summer, we want him in the job sooner rather than later so he can get on with it.



3 Responses to “Does Roman Know Who He Wants?”

  1. I strongly believe in our club, chelsea. But ROMAN should know money doesnt answer all things. Since the special one is gone i prefer yuothful Roy keane, esperienced Lippi, or Ancelloti to take over, and this is the moment every chelsea fan expects to assess the negotiating power of keyon or financial muscle of IBRAMOVIC.

  2. The thing is…..I expect we will be hearing Kenyon come out with some tripe along the lines of…..”He (insert managers name) was always our first choice. We just had to sort out the contract side of things before we made an announcement”.

    Do none of these men have the balls to say to RA that he’s going about this the wrong way and his decisions arent doing us any favours?

  3. I think the entire chelsea management have made a big mistake by sacking Jose in the first place and could not swallow their pride nor hide their face in shame as Jose’s replacement founmbled.

    The only opportunity to replace Grant with Jose again saw darkness as the same pride prevented the deal.

    What is it that Jose requested that cannot be accepted nor compromised at least for one more season?

    Which good coach will come to premiership and not have the final say on which player he wants nor which player is no more useful to him ??.

    Why sack a coach in the middle of a competition?
    Why sack a coach who is widely loved by fans in football?
    Why sack a coach who is loved by 2/3 majority of your players and also 80% of your key players?
    What exactly do you want to achieve?.
    When you dont have a better replacement.

    Abrahmovic should know that there are people who love chelsea with passion and that without these passionate supporters football wont be of any interest to him nor anyone at that.