The Untouchables II: Not In Their Back-Yard

After days on end of having to read about why JT shouldn’t even play for England again, nevermind captain them, followed by the judgement from on high about Chelsea fans’ alleged racist booing of Rio Ferdinand at the weekend, I sat down last night to put a bit of a rant together on here by way of response.

I know I’m not the only one who’s been totally sick of Billy Smart’s gang following us around this season.  No sooner were they done trying to wind AVB up, than the circus rolled back into town on the JT racism bandwagon – and it had all got a bit tedious.

The thing about journo’s in this country is, they love to build people up just for the fun of knocking them down again.  Whether collectively as club’s or individually in the case of manager’s and players,it seems to be celebrated amongst the press a damn sight more than our national sport does – and as TheChelseaBlog pointed out last year, they still seem to think this should go unchallenged.

Take the weekend for example, at home to United and predictably a pretty vocal affair. Was I surprised to hear Rio Ferdinand royally booed? No, but then was anyone? He’s hardly one of the games most modest characters is he? Well, apparently plenty of other people were surprised to hear him booed, stunned even, given the furore it seemed to provoke.

In fact, in The Mirror, we had a one man crusade insisting “Let’s not pretend this isn’t happening. Let’s not pretend it was just an isolated incident.  Let’s not ignore the fact that a trend is re-establishing itself in English football, a deeply depressing, sinister trend.” Stirring stuff eh? Although probably not quite as ‘stirring’ as the tweets later, questioning why Rio was booed, suggesting “they’re booing a bloke over a case of racial abuse”.

So, irrespective of some of our own players being booed at the grounds of our rivals, when it happens at Stamford Bridge, the motivation must be racist because the press tell everyone it is – and they wouldn’t just try and stir things up for us would they? No, of course they wouldn’t, because that would mean we’d see things like this come up on twitter timelines “Well done Rio staying focused the booing of him is outrageous”. I mean, we know Ashley Cole, for example has never experienced anything like it, right? Mind you, I’m not sure he’d ever be pushed so relentlessly on twitter to backstab an England team-mate.

Yet it’s all about the shame our players bring on this country’s game isn’t it? Or the embarrassment supporters bring on clubs? We know all this because the press tell us it continually.  These fine, upstanding paragons of virtue, who have certainly stood in judgement of our club and our captain tell us, and anyone else who will listen, how abhorrent it is when something is said or done that strays outside the boundaries of acceptable behaviour.

Imagine then, sitting there reading a few random posts on Twitter and coming across one of these crusaders of morality replying to the question “Do you get any lower than taking Murdoch’s cash?” with the response “yes, you can. For example, you can be in a crowd that crushes 39 people to death.” I mean, can you imagine the reaction a player would get for saying that? You’d expect the vultures to have finished the carcass off within seconds really wouldn’t you?

So why was my timeline like the Mary Celeste as far as the Band of Brothers was concerned? Maybe because a remark had been taken out of context and the ensuing witch-hunt felt a little uncomfortable?

Imagine that!

 



7 Responses to “The Untouchables II: Not In Their Back-Yard”

  1. utterly blind nonsense out of you and typical shit behaviour from Chelsea you booed a man because he stood up for his brother and not that tramp you call a captain.

  2. You are way off the mark and as partisan and selfish as they come. I wish you had kept these juvenile thoughts to yourself. They say it is better to keep quiet and make people think you are foolish than to open it and confirm it (just as you have done).

  3. so your saying that rio was getting stick off the rent boys, but it had nothing to do with him and his brother getting stick after one of them being racially abused by an idiot called john terry?
    you twit

  4. I totally agree i dont know how the press are still getting away with this harassment. Not only with john terry but with fernando torres as well it’s turned into bullying i believe in torres’ case. I strongly believe the press our one of the main reasons why chelsea ared oing so bad this season all the players and manager are under so much pressure.

  5. Yes it will kill them if Chelsea and AVB succeed. T

  6. Very true and I agree with Alex too. It’s disgusting the hypocrisy from the media and their biased reports. All iv been reading about is how United made one of the greatest comebacks in history and how stable they are and how we are falling apart. No mention of the very controversial decisions their 12th player made, or the fact we had 5 of our first team off the pitch unless you read a match report from a chelsea fan. The players did great considering and I am purely gutted the way United were aloud to come back in that way and see no mention of just how unfair it was. Webb won’t get looked at, justice won’t be done and we will just get butchered by press again. Same with terry and nando, there already written off in medias eyes. Torres looks almost scared when he gets the ball, so much pressure to score.

  7. The whole pious outpouring over this Rio being boo’d thing has been pathetic. Rio Ferdinand’s been boo’d since he first played at the Bridge (well damn near I’m sure). What’s not to like for Chelsea fans? An ex Hammer and Leeds player, rivalling JT for the England Captaincy for the past few years, Kicking a female Steward in the thigh in the privacy of the tunnel, flicking V signs at The Chelsea supporters behind the refs back and recently using Twitter to let us all know where he stands over as yet unproven Racism accusations. A high profile interview on BBC brought this into sharp focus in time for Sunday – but naturally the press use this as a means of attacking Chelsea supporters.
    The same Chelsea supporters who 2 weeks previously at Loftus rd were under tremendous scrutiny (with Anton yards away) and had failed to give the media the story they desired.
    Sad attempt to create a story on Sunday was pathetic in the extreme, but hardly out of the ordinary on recent form.